Start with your review process
Your trade, your document package, your checklist. Establish the supported scope before relying on the output.
Read the bid documents together. Check where the plan, the schedule and the scope still leave you a decision.

01 / The documents, side by side

02 / What a useful walkthrough establishes
Your trade, your document package, your checklist. Establish the supported scope before relying on the output.
Compare the first pass with your own review, including what was missed or could not be checked.
Confirm the actual handoff into your estimate. Interpretation, pricing and approval stay with your team.
03 / Where the review time goes
Explore the review problems this page is built around.
The plan and the schedule can leave two readings for the same item. Put both source locations together so the estimator can raise the question before choosing a basis for the bid.
Check the project’s actual order-of-precedence and clarification requirements. A comparison can show where documents differ; it does not decide which document governs your contract.
Check the bid package’s clarification process and deadline. Surface an unresolved item while there is still a route to ask, and record the basis used if an answer is not available.
Check the drawings, specifications, responsibility notes and scope letter together. Where responsibility remains unclear, name the question and its owner before relying on an inclusion or exclusion.
Inclusions, exclusions and qualifications change what two bids cover. Make those differences visible so a comparison can account for the scope behind the number.
How high you board and finish a wall depends on the ceiling above it, so the ceiling take-off has to come first, off a different sheet. Half the quantities in a package are locked behind a quantity that lives somewhere else in it.
A sketch changes the exact sheet you already measured. And underneath that sits the older trap, which is being handed a stale set to bid and then held to the current one. It is why a careful bid names the drawing date and lists every addendum it actually used.
Some on the drawings, some in the spec book, some in the addenda. And the parts that cost the most are the least visible. Whether a wall is rated, how many layers it takes, whether it runs all the way to the deck. None of that is on the plan. It is in a detail.
The graphic language gets picked up by osmosis and everybody assumes you already have it. So the first hours on an unfamiliar package go to working out how this firm says things, before a single quantity is measured. Nobody pays for those hours and they recur with every new relationship.
If a requirement describes performance rather than a complete design, check the named design responsibilities, required submittals and acceptance process before carrying it into your scope.
Other parts of the set
Your set. Your review.
Choose a project you already know and the checklist your team already uses. Agree on the supported scope before sharing files. Compare what the first pass caught, what it missed and what still needed you.
Discuss your workflow ↗AI supports the first pass. Human review remains required.
Analytics cookies. We use Google Analytics to understand how this site is used. In the EU, EEA, UK and Switzerland it runs only if you accept, and everywhere else it runs unless you decline. Read the Privacy Policy.