Setmark handles the repetitive first pass, surfaces likely issues with plan context, and leaves every decision with your engineering team.
A reviewer flags a beam sitting at the same elevation as a drain line. That is not one comment. It is two disciplines, a meeting to decide who moves, revisions on both sheets, a response letter, and another trip through the queue.
Structural reads structural. Civil reads civil. The conflict lives in the space between them, so it survives the in-house review. Then the client moves something late and wants the revision back the same day, which is exactly when the second pair of eyes gets skipped.
In ACEC's Q2 2026 survey, 33 percent of engineering firms said they had turned down work in the previous six months because they did not have the staff for it. That is down from 51 percent in Q4 2024, so it is improving. One firm in three is still saying no to work it wanted.
Setmark does not replace engineers. There are not enough of them to replace. The profession loses more engineers each year than it gains, so the throughput has to come from the people already on staff. AI can read a set quickly, but it cannot weigh a tradeoff or put its name on a drawing. What changes is how much your existing team gets through in a week.
Setmark's rules are authored once and then run as ordinary software. The same set produces the same findings every time, and every finding points at the sheet it came from. Nothing is generated fresh on each run.
Every engineering firm reviews against its own standards, so a generic run tells you nothing. Send a set with real coordination in it, along with what your engineers check against, and we configure it before the call. Then you see what gets pinned and what your engineer would still have to decide.
We will only use this to schedule your demo. No list, no spam.